Back to Blog
Big Tech July 31, 2026 5 min read

Meta Beats Revenue Estimates but Misses on EPS as AI Spending Guts Profitability

Meta's Q2 revenue rose 28% to $60.8 billion, ahead of estimates, but net income fell 14% to $15.8 billion and capex guidance climbed toward $145 billion. AI infrastructure spending is now eating directly into the bottom line.

Meta Beats Revenue Estimates but Misses on EPS as AI Spending Guts Profitability

Meta reported Q2 2026 revenue of $60.8 billion, up 28% year-over-year and ahead of the $59.5 billion Wall Street expected. Advertising revenue alone hit $59.3 billion, topping the $59.07 billion estimate. On the top line, Meta’s core business is still growing faster than analysts modeled.

The bottom line tells a different story. Earnings per share came in at $6.18, well below the $7.14 estimate — a 13% year-over-year decline. Net income fell 14% to $15.8 billion, dragged down by a $2.4 billion legal charge, severance costs, and rising research spending. Revenue growth didn’t translate into profit growth; it got absorbed almost entirely by the cost of building AI infrastructure.

Capex is the mechanism. Meta spent $31.1 billion on capital expenditures in Q2 alone, and raised its full-year 2026 guidance to a $135-145 billion range, up from the $125-145 billion it had previously set. Nearly all of that spending is going toward data centers and AI compute — the same GPU and memory supply chain currently facing the price hikes squeezing Nvidia and AMD’s consumer lineup. Some analysts now expect Meta’s capex to keep climbing toward $215 billion as the AI buildout continues, which would make this year’s guidance a floor, not a ceiling.

This is the tension every major AI lab and hyperscaler is navigating right now, and Meta’s quarter puts hard numbers on it: the AI infrastructure bet requires spending that outpaces the revenue it’s currently generating, and investors are starting to price that gap directly into earnings reactions rather than giving companies a pass on “growth investment.” A 28% revenue beat used to be an unambiguous win. Here it wasn’t enough to offset a capex number growing even faster.

For teams evaluating AI infrastructure costs of their own — whether that’s cloud GPU rental, on-prem hardware, or API spend — Meta’s numbers are a useful external benchmark: even at hyperscaler scale and hyperscaler negotiating leverage, capex growth is currently outpacing revenue growth in AI infrastructure specifically. That’s not a signal to avoid AI investment, but it is a signal that the unit economics haven’t settled yet, and betting on “it gets cheaper next quarter” isn’t currently supported by what the biggest spenders are seeing.

Sources

Meta earnings AI infrastructure capex